Shawn Pearce <spearce@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > Junio C Hamano <junkio@xxxxxxx> wrote: >> Shawn Pearce <spearce@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes: >> >> > I don't know if I've made this more complex than I really need to >> > but I've permitted multiple windows per pack. There is just one >> > LRU of all windows across all packs and a maximum amount of address >> > space to use for pack mappings. Least recently used window gets >> > tossed when we need a different window. This permits us to keep >> > say a window active on the front of a pack (near the commits) and >> > another different active window closer to the back (near the blobs). >> >> Sounds good. That is exactly what I was expecting it to be done. > > So I have this implemented but its against the 32 bit index. > It passes the full test suite and appears to be working as intended. > > I am going to rebase the changes to the 64 bit index in `pu` > and clean up my history. Its currently one massive commit with > lots of changes that should be broken down into slightly more > digestable chunks. > > I'll try to do that tonight and get a patch series out. My email > is currently proving to be unstable so you may not get the series > until later on Wed. Take your time. My usual git day is Wednesday but this week it is shot and I won't be doing much gitting until later this week. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html