Junio C Hamano wrote: > Jakub Narebski <jnareb@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > >> Jakub Narebski wrote: >> >>> index 199fbe87384cd3f4686916277dd124cefc751e8a..f3b762de92e579300eba3f53ee26b2a80b4e76c7 100644 >> >> Hmmm... I do wonder why --binary implies --full-index option. > > Patch safety. Yours happened to be a creation patch so it might > not matter in this particular case, but we would want to be > reasonably sure there is no ambiguity in the preimage when you > are doing a modification patch. Couldn't we do this (show full sha1) only for the binary part of patch? -- Jakub Narebski Warsaw, Poland ShadeHawk on #git - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html