Re: [PATCH][RFC] Add git-archive-tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Rene Scharfe <rene.scharfe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Currently git-archive-tree -f tar is slower than git-tar-tree.  This is
> because it is welded to the side of the existing code to minimize patch
> size, and I also suspect read_tree_recursive() to be quite a bit slower
> than builtin-tar-tree.c::traverse_tree().

Yes, I suspect "struct object" and friends are very inefficient
to use for things like this.  "struct tree_desc" based traverser
is much preferred.



-- 
VGER BF report: U 0.772588
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]