Re: Why do base objects appear behind the delta in packs?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Shawn Pearce wrote:

> From a data locality perspective putting the base object before
> or after the delta shouldn't matter, as either way the delta
> is useless without the base.  So placing the base immediately
> before the delta should perform just as well as placing it after.
> Either way the OS should have the base in cache by the time the
> delta is being accessed.

_Should_ perform? Have you got any measurements of speed of creating "base
before delta" pack, and reading objects from this kind of pack?

-- 
Jakub Narebski
Warsaw, Poland
ShadeHawk on #git


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]