Re: [PATCH] Refactor sha1_pack_index_name and sha1_pack_name to use a common backend

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Junio C Hamano <junkio@xxxxxxx> wrote Sun, Aug 27, 2006:
> Jonas Fonseca <fonseca@xxxxxxx> writes:
> 
> > This adds another pair of static buffers, if that's a problem and the
> > cleanup is still wanted I can change it to use malloc.
> 
> As a clean-up, I'd rather see a patch that removes the need for
> these two functions and one struct member, rather than keeping
> these two misguided functions and consolidating their
> implementations.

Thanks for the outline, I will look into removing this limitation.

-- 
Jonas Fonseca
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]