On Sun, 27 Aug 2006, Krzysztof Halasa wrote: > > > Maybe sha-256 could be considered for the next major-rev of git? > > Not sure, but _if_ we want it we should do it sooner rather than > later. Modifying git-convert-objects.c to rewrite the regular sha1 into a sha256 should be fairly straightforward. It's never been used since the early days (and has limits like a maximum of a million objects etc that can need fixing), but it shouldn't be "fundamentally hard" per se. Linus - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html