Le mer 23 août 2006 04:32, Pierre Habouzit a écrit : > I'm currently trying to make git compile with more strict gcc flags > (-g -O2 -Wall -Wextra -Wno-unused -Werror to be precise) and I've > spotted a first bug due to a signed/unsigned comparison. still in the same kind of "problems" sha1_name.c:512 has: if (active_nr < 0) return -1; but active_nr is defined as an unsigned (in cache.h/cache-read.c). Also note that there is a *lot* of signed/unsigned comparisons due to the fact that it's unsigned, and that it's often compared to positions that are ints (I assume pos need the negative values to mean "error"). so either those two lines are too much, or active_nr has to be a plain signed int. I'm not used to git sources enough yet to be able to make the right decision. -- ·O· Pierre Habouzit ··O madcoder@xxxxxxxxxx OOO http://www.madism.org
Attachment:
pgpgNejEvF1u9.pgp
Description: PGP signature