Re: Unresolved issues #3

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 17 Aug 2006, A Large Angry SCM wrote:

> Junio C Hamano wrote:
> ...
> > * "A Large Angry SCM" wrote a nice summary, "Git files data
> >   formats documentation".
> > 
> >   Message-ID: <44D51D47.9090700@xxxxxxxxx>
> > 
> >   With one final update by Nico yesterday, I think it is ready
> >   for inclusion.
> > 
> >   Does somebody care to make a patch out of it to add it to
> >   Documentation/technical/, maybe removing pack-format.txt there
> >   after making sure all it talks about is covered by the new
> >   documentation?
> > 
> >   I do not have enough "virginity" to spot omissions in the
> >   description anymore, so comments from somebody new to the
> >   system are very much appreciated.
> > 
> 
> Two things:
> 
> 1) I disagree with Nico's assessment that, other than his, there can not
> exist any type 2 packs that have bit 6 set to mean copy from result.

Care to explain why?

Since this code is mine I can tell you that no official GIT version ever 
produced such a pack.  The code to make use of that bit was quite 
involving and the end result wasn't great at all so I never published 
said code.  This is also why current GIT accepts both pack version 2 and 
3 without any distinction using the same code in patch-delta.c on the 
basis that no version 2 packs ever used that bit.


Nicolas
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]