Re: [PATCH 00/28] clean-ups of static functions and returns

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



David Rientjes wrote:

> This patch series cleans up a number of static function returns that are either 
> meaningless or could be more efficiently written.

Could you please make description of patch series email to be parent
(ancestor) of all patches emails, i.e. for patches either to be 
chain-replied to introduction email, or all be replies to introduction
email.

It makes for easier reading/viewing/applying/ignoring the series.

Thanks in advance
-- 
Jakub Narebski
Warsaw, Poland
ShadeHawk on #git


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]