On Sat, Aug 12, 2006 at 01:03:47AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Fredrik Kuivinen <freku045@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
> > diff --git a/builtin-update-index.c b/builtin-update-index.c
> > index 24dca47..f8f5e10 100644
> > --- a/builtin-update-index.c
> > +++ b/builtin-update-index.c
> > @@ -493,7 +493,7 @@ int cmd_update_index(int argc, const cha
> >
> > newfd = hold_lock_file_for_update(lock_file, get_index_file());
> > if (newfd < 0)
> > - die("unable to create new cachefile");
> > + die("unable to lock index file: %s", strerror(errno));
>
> Looking at output from:
>
> $ git grep -A 3 hold_lock_file_for_update
>
> I wonder if it might be more consistent to do something like
> this instead. It removes more lines than it adds ;-).
Looks good, one small comment below.
> diff --git a/lockfile.c b/lockfile.c
> index 2346e0e..a5ea49b 100644
> --- a/lockfile.c
> +++ b/lockfile.c
> @@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ static void remove_lock_file_on_signal(i
> raise(signo);
> }
>
> -int hold_lock_file_for_update(struct lock_file *lk, const char *path)
> +static int lock_file(struct lock_file *lk, const char *path)
> {
> int fd;
> sprintf(lk->filename, "%s.lock", path);
> @@ -41,6 +41,14 @@ int hold_lock_file_for_update(struct loc
> return fd;
> }
>
> +int hold_lock_file_for_update(struct lock_file *lk, const char *path, int die_on_error)
> +{
> + int fd = lock_file(lk, path);
> + if (fd < 0 && die_on_error)
> + die("unable to create new index file");
Could we have (something like)
die("unable to lock index file: %s", strerror(errno));
here instead?
> + return fd;
> +}
> +
> int commit_lock_file(struct lock_file *lk)
> {
> char result_file[PATH_MAX];
- Fredrik
-
: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html