On Mon, 7 Aug 2006, Shawn Pearce wrote: > What the heck is going on? Since when did git cat-file happily > consider a tag to be a tag, a commit and a tree? Its that > intentional that we're peeling back the object to the requested type? I think it's done that for a long time now. All of the other commands that take a tree or a commit will accept a tag, so why shouldn't "git cat-file tree"? -Daniel *This .sig left intentionally blank* - : send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html