On 8/7/06, Jon Smirl <jonsmirl@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 8/6/06, Shawn Pearce <spearce@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > So the new version should take about 20 MB of memory and should > produce a valid pack and index in the same time as it does only > the pack now. Plus it won't generate duplicates. I did a run with this and it works great.
Great.
I'm staring at the cvs2svn code now trying to figure out how to modify it without rewriting everything. I may just leave it all alone and build a table with cvs_file:rev to sha-1 mappings. It would be much more efficient to carry sha-1 throughout the stages but that may require significant rework.
Probably a good thing. If the patch isn't intrusive it has a better chance of merging well over time and of being merged upstream -- ;-) m - : send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html