Re: Licensing and the library version of git

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

On Thu, 27 Jul 2006, Jon Smirl wrote:

> On 7/27/06, Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@xxxxxx> wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > On Thu, 27 Jul 2006, Petr Baudis wrote:
> > 
> > > And I didn't even get to discussing whether LGPL is actually desirable
> > > for Git.
> > 
> > ... or whether it is neccessary for an Eclipse-plugin to something else
> > than GPL.
> 
> Eclipse is not licensed GPL.

We are talking about Eclipse _plugins_ here. Often (especially when the 
deciding people have $$ in their eyes), plugins have less restrictions 
(for example, WSAD would not be possible if _all_ extensions to Eclipse 
would have to be CPL).

Ciao,
Dscho

-
: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]