Re: [PATCH] tar-tree: add the "tar.applyUmask" config option

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Willy Tarreau <w@xxxxxx> writes:

> While I agreed with Linus that the very permissive file modes set in tar
> archives were not particularly a problem for kernel users, I'm finding
> that for some other projects it sometimes becomes really annoying, to
> the point that I finally considered using a plain tar instead. This is a
> shame because tar-tree is really fast an powerful, and I like its ability
> to enforce permissions when those of the local dir might be wrong for
> various reasons.

I do not have problem with an option to allow a non-default
behaviour in this area.  Maybe we might want to be able to set
the mask in the configuration file as well, perhaps like...

	tar.umask = user ;# use from the current process'
        tar.umask = 0    ;# same as default
        tar.umask = 002  ;# group friendly

-
: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]