Dear diary, on Thu, Jun 22, 2006 at 04:17:15PM CEST, I got a letter where Jon Smirl <jonsmirl@xxxxxxxxx> said that... > On 6/22/06, Petr Baudis <pasky@xxxxxxx> wrote: > >Dear diary, on Thu, Jun 22, 2006 at 02:41:16PM CEST, I got a letter > >where Jon Smirl <jonsmirl@xxxxxxxxx> said that... > >> I'm tracking cvs using this sequence. > >> > >> cvs update > >> cg rm -a > >> cg commit > >> cg add -r . > >> cg commit > >> > >> Is there a way to avoid the two commits? If you do the add with out > >> the intervening commit it just adds the files back. > > How about a cg-sync? Tracking cvs (or other SCM) with git is probably > a common activitiy while you try to convince the other CVS users to > switch. It is probably worth a little write up in the readme on the > best way to do it. I have added and pushed out support for cg-add -a, now it should be merely a matter of cg-rm -a && cg-add -a and I have documented that. -- Petr "Pasky" Baudis Stuff: http://pasky.or.cz/ Snow falling on Perl. White noise covering line noise. Hides all the bugs too. -- J. Putnam - : send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html