Re: [PATCH 1/3] git-format-patch: Make the second and subsequent mails replies to the first

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Dear diary, on Fri, Jul 14, 2006 at 09:32:27PM CEST, I got a letter
where Junio C Hamano <junkio@xxxxxxx> said that...
> Josh Triplett <josht@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> 
> > ..., but you
> > suggested that you didn't mind having threading as the default.
> 
> Did I? ... then that was either a mistake or miscommunication.
> 
> I do mind changing the default output.  I do not mind threading
> as the default ONLY IF user asks for output with these extra
> headers.

What's the big deal? It's not like we didn't change those things in the
past if it doesn't horribly break everything and the new behaviour is
clearly more sensible.

It would be good to know what the general policy on this is nowadays.

-- 
				Petr "Pasky" Baudis
Stuff: http://pasky.or.cz/
Snow falling on Perl. White noise covering line noise.
Hides all the bugs too. -- J. Putnam
-
: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]