Re: when is "git diff" output suitable for patch?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jul 13, 2006 at 02:51:20PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> 
> >> As far as I recall "git diff" never defaulted to -M.
> >
> > Hm.  Is this related?:
> >
> > commit 42efbf6d8a5b4902c55a2f6e96034625c056ba1f
> > Author: Junio C Hamano <junkio@xxxxxxx>
> > Date:   Sat Mar 11 17:44:10 2006 -0800
> >
> >     git-diff: -p disables rename detection.
> 
> Ah, sorry, it _did_ default to -M; it was in such an ancient
> past and the shell wrapper wasn't initially done by me, so I
> misremembered.

Perfectly understandable; thanks for the help.--b.
-
: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]