On Mon, 2006-07-10 02:52:08 -0400, Pavel Roskin <proski@xxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, 2006-07-10 at 08:25 +0200, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote: > > On Mon, 2006-07-10 02:22:03 -0400, Pavel Roskin <proski@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > > This means that the Sun compiler has almost all c99 features used by git > > > with just a little exception (initializers). I think it's fair that we > > > fix this incompatibility. It's very very minor compared to what "gcc > > > -std=c89 -pedantic" would have required. > > ^^^^^^^^ > > You're kidding, aren't you? [...] > We can satisfy the Sun's compiler and yet retain flexible arrays and > other c99 goodies. > > Maybe I'm missing your point (or you joke). Why should we jump through the hoops to support an obsolete standard because proprietary compilers don't stand today's standards? MfG, JBG -- Jan-Benedict Glaw jbglaw@xxxxxxxxxx . +49-172-7608481 _ O _ "Eine Freie Meinung in einem Freien Kopf | Gegen Zensur | Gegen Krieg _ _ O für einen Freien Staat voll Freier Bürger" | im Internet! | im Irak! O O O ret = do_actions((curr | FREE_SPEECH) & ~(NEW_COPYRIGHT_LAW | DRM | TCPA));
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature