On Mon, 2006-07-10 01:22:55 -0400, Shawn Pearce <spearce@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Sat, 2006-07-08 15:03:27 -0400, Shawn Pearce <spearce@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Monday I'll look to see if there's an option that can be given to > > > the Solaris compiler to make it accept these constructs. Maybe a > > > simple CFLAGS change in my config.mak would resolve what this patch > > > was trying to do. > > So neither of the constructs my patch removes are supported in this > (old) compiler, although a newer one might accept them with -xc99. > Yes, I tried building a pristine git-1.4.1 with -xc99. It barfed, > as one would expect given the description above. > > Since we don't have a newer version of cc available (not sure why) > I'm stuck with needing to make the code changes in my patch just > to get GIT to compile. What about installing a compiler that implements more of C99, like installing a gcc instance? I guess you're on a Sun system, there should be precompiled binaries available. MfG, JBG -- Jan-Benedict Glaw jbglaw@xxxxxxxxxx . +49-172-7608481 _ O _ "Eine Freie Meinung in einem Freien Kopf | Gegen Zensur | Gegen Krieg _ _ O für einen Freien Staat voll Freier Bürger" | im Internet! | im Irak! O O O ret = do_actions((curr | FREE_SPEECH) & ~(NEW_COPYRIGHT_LAW | DRM | TCPA));
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature