Re: [PATCH] Additional merge-base tests

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

On Wed, 5 Jul 2006, A Large Angry SCM wrote:

> If grafts in your repository create a cycle, the misbehavior of merge-base
> should be among the least of your concerns.

Right. BUT grafts can be very helpful to connect branches which were 
independently imported into git. And in these cases, the clockSkew really 
is no clockSkew. But in that case, the generation number would have to be 
recalculated also.

Anyway, I think that it should be a configurable, which defaults to off, 
i.e. in the normal case merge-base should behave as it does now. And if we 
have that configurable, we might as well take the safe but dumb approach 
to just traverse _everything_.

Ciao,
Dscho

-
: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]