Re: Experimental "git prune"

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On Wed, 5 Jul 2006, Johannes Schindelin wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> On Tue, 4 Jul 2006, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> 
> > static void process_tag(struct tag *tag, struct object_array *p, const char *name)
> > {
> > 	struct object *obj = &tag->object;
> > 	struct name_path me;
> 
> AFAICS this variable is set, but not used:
> 
> > 
> > 	if (obj->flags & SEEN)
> > 		return;
> > 	obj->flags |= SEEN;
> > 
> > 	me.up = NULL;
> > 	me.elem = "tag:/";
> > 	me.elem_len = 5;
> > 
> > 	if (parse_tag(tag) < 0)
> > 		die("bad tag object %s", sha1_to_hex(obj->sha1));
> > 	add_object(tag->tagged, p, NULL, name);

Yeah, that NULL should be "&me".

That said, we don't actually use the object name logic at all, so we could 
drop it entirely. Having it _might_ allow some of the error messages to be 
better, who knows..

			Linus
-
: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]