Hi, On Mon, 3 Jul 2006, Yakov Lerner wrote: > It would be arguable whether, say, 10% better compression is worth > x(3-8) slower compression. But 3-4% better compression at the cost of > x(3-8) slower compression time as data suggest ? I think this begs for > switching the default to Z_DEFAULT_COMPRESSION The real problem, of course, is that you cannot know before you tried, if your data is really well compressible or not. Ciao, Dscho - : send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html