Re: [PATCH] Introduce Git.pm (v3)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Junio C Hamano <junkio@xxxxxxx> writes:

> Petr Baudis <pasky@xxxxxxx> writes:
>
>> Also, is there any real problem with just using -fPIC?
>
> Personally, not really, but I consider it a workaround having to
> compile with -fPIC (being able to compile with -fPIC is a
> feature).
>
> Doesn't it have performance implications to use -fPIC when you
> do not have to?
>
> By the way, you also need to adjust the testsuite so that it
> finds the Perl modules from freshly built tree before
> installing.  I think (but haven't checked yet) the stuff written
> in Python does that already, so you might want to mimic it.

So what was being compiled was a shared Git.so.

32bit x86 is on of the few architectures that allows you to build
a .so without compiling with -fPIC.  

The question is why are we building with a .so?

Eric
-
: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]