On Sat, Jun 17, 2006 at 10:34:43AM -0400, Chris Shoemaker wrote:
> Are you saying there was no pre-existing cache file when the patched
> version was first run?
It was the sample script you provided to demonstrate the problem which
showed the new issue: it does a "cvsps -x" first, then runs
git-cvsimport, which runs "cvsps -u". That one does fails. I'm
pretty sure the cache does not exist beforehand, since your script
creates the repo in a temporary directory.
BTW, I'll see about adding a testsuite to cvsps, based on the
framework used by git. All these scriptlets used to exhibit the
various problems have to be kept somewhere.
> Did you delete it? If so, then there's a bug somewhere.
I do think there is a bug somewhere :)
> The complaint is basically, Hey, there's an initial branch
> determination already made for this file, but it's not the one I would
> have made, so it must have been restored from a cache file that I
> didn't make.
OK, thanks for the clarification.
Best regards,
--
Yann Dirson <ydirson@xxxxxxxxxx> |
Debian-related: <dirson@xxxxxxxxxx> | Support Debian GNU/Linux:
| Freedom, Power, Stability, Gratis
http://ydirson.free.fr/ | Check <http://www.debian.org/>
-
: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html