On 6/14/06, Ryan Anderson <ryan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Tue, Jun 13, 2006 at 07:01:08PM -0700, Eric Wong wrote: > Anybody want to see how my latest patches to git-svn (and using SVN perl > libraries) stacks up against the mozilla repo? Speedwise, I don't > expect git-svn to be too different than git-svnimport, but it should use > much less memory (I'll probably port the hacks to git-svnimport, too). I've got access to a pretty good machine to run this on - where can I grab the svn repo from? (I can just grab the CVS one and convert it, first, as well, just point me at that, if that's got more bandwidth.)
rsync -az cvs-mirror.mozilla.org::mozilla ~/mozilla/cvs-mirror It took about three days for my machine to convert that cvs to svn. I have the converted repo local but it is 8.2GB and I have 256kb up. There is no real purpose in converting mozilla cvs to svn to git other than to test the tools. My last attempt at svn to git ran five days before I lost power. Towards the end it was getting significantly slow implying some kind of n squared problem in the import process. The idea was to see if cvsimport and svnimport both end up with the same output. I am going to use git-cvsimport on the mozilla repo but that tool needs to 2GB+ physical RAM to run. I ordered 2GB more and it will be here tomorrow. I have just been playing with the svn conversion while I wait five days for my 2nd day air package to show up.
-- Ryan Anderson sometimes Pug Majere
-- Jon Smirl jonsmirl@xxxxxxxxx - : send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html