Re: [PATCH] gitweb: Adding a `blame' interface.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On Mon, 12 Jun 2006, Florian Forster wrote:
> 
> Would it help to cache `git-annotate's output, e.g. using one of the
> `Cache::Cache' modules? Or is browsing of blobs too sparse for this to
> result in a performance gain? I'm sure the modules could be integrated
> as a weak precondition.

The apache setup at least on kernel.org is already set up to do caching, 
as long as the generated headers for the page allow it in the first place.

So caching inside gitweb is generally pointless, at least when it's at the 
level of one result page. At a higher level, if the internal caching might 
improve performance of _other_ pages because it caches the result of some 
intermediate important thing, it might be a different issue.

		Linus
-
: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]