Hi Jon, Quoting Jon Smirl <jonsmirl@xxxxxxxxx>: > I was able to import Mozilla into SVN without problem, it just occured > to me to then import the SVN repository in git. I feel bad that I didn't suggest it before. That's quite expected. Subversion was created by CVS developers with the intention of replacing CVS. cvs2svn was written by the same CVS developers, who paid attention to all CVS quirks. cvs2svn is quite mature and it has a testsuite, if I remember correctly. My concern is how well a Subversion repository can be mapped to git considering that Subversion is branch agnostic. But if it works for Mozilla, this approach could be recommended for anything big and serious. > The import has been > running a few hours now and it is up to the year 2000 (starts in > 1998). Since I haven't hit any errors yet it will probably finish ok. > I should have the results in the morning. I wonder how long it will > take to start gitk on a 10GB repository. That's the "raison d'etre" of qgit. I don't know if gitk has anything that qgit doesn't, except bisecting. > Once I get this monster into git, are there tools that will let me > keep it in sync with Mozilla CVS? Ideally, make Mozilla developers use git :-) > SVN renamed numeric branches to this form, unlabeled-3.7.24, so that > may be a problem. I think git-svn is supposed to do the svn->git part, but I'm afraid it will need some work to do it effectively. Google search for "cvs2svn incremental" brings some patches. cvsup can be used to synchronize the CVS repository. -- Regards, Pavel Roskin - : send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html