On Tue, 2006-06-06 at 12:15, Junio C Hamano wrote: > I think the virtual hosting of git-daemon is very important, and > I do not want to have a half-baked one hurriedly cobbled > together for 1.4.0 on the server side. Agreed. > I do agree it is a good idea to have the client-side support in > 1.4.0; that would work well with the current git-daemon. Since > the extension is backward compatible, we can tell the users to > use 1.4.0 or later clients when the daemon side is done. That > is much nicer than telling them to use what's on "master" that > is later than such-and-such commit. Exactly. > > Any chance for that? If you'd like, I work on resubmitting > > just those bits with the connect function refactoring > > that you outlined. > > I appreciate the offer very much. No problem. > Although I said port is > something the server side can usually tell, I would throw in > port there as well. Can do. > Any reason to spell HOST in all uppercase by the way? I would never suggest that it came to me from gittus in an IRC day-dream...? :-) Consider it all lowercaseified instead. jdl - : send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html