Re: http-fetch troubles

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I think this fixes the http trouble with tree parser change in
the "next" branch.

-- >8 --
fetch.c: do not call process_tree() from process_tree().

This function reads a freshly fetched tree object, and schedules
the objects pointed by it for further fetching, so calling lookup-tree
and doing process_tree() recursively from there does not make
much sense.  We need to use process() on it to make sure we
fetch it first.

Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@xxxxxxx>
---
diff --git a/fetch.c b/fetch.c
index ec2d8c3..107504b 100644
--- a/fetch.c
+++ b/fetch.c
@@ -46,13 +46,20 @@ static int process_tree(struct tree *tre
 	desc.buf = tree->buffer;
 	desc.size = tree->size;
 	while (tree_entry(&desc, &entry)) {
+		struct object *obj = NULL;
+
 		if (S_ISDIR(entry.mode)) {
 			struct tree *tree = lookup_tree(entry.sha1);
-			process_tree(tree);
-		} else {
+			if (tree)
+				obj = &tree->object;
+		}
+		else {
 			struct blob *blob = lookup_blob(entry.sha1);
-			process(&blob->object);
+			if (blob)
+				obj = &blob->object;
 		}
+		if (!obj || process(obj))
+			return -1;
 	}
 	free(tree->buffer);
 	tree->buffer = NULL;

-
: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]