Florian Forster <octo@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > The regexes detecting merges (while still relying on the commit messages, > though) have been improved to catch saner (and hopefully more) messages. The > old regex was so generic that it often matched something else and missed the > actual merge-message. > Also, the regex given with the `-M' commandline-option is checked first: > Explicitely given regexes should be considered better than the builtin ones, > and should therefore be given a chance to match a message first. The latter part sounds immensely sane. The former I am not a good judge, since I do not interact with subversion repositories myself. Opinions from real svn users? BTW, did anybody received the latest "What's in git.git" I sent out about 20 minutes ago? - : send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html