Re: [PATCH] Fixed Cygwin CR-munging problem in mailsplit

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Junio C Hamano <junkio@xxxxxxx> writes:

> I personally think this is a right change.  Provided if MTAs on
> the path between patch originator and you are not broken and
> your MUA saved the message with CR/LF distinction in the
> contents intact, this should do more right thing.
>
> I see broken patches every once in a while, but when they are
> mangled by the mailpath, CRLF is the least of the problem; they
> have other whitespace breakage that makes them unapplicable
> anyway.
>
> Having said that, however, that historically used to be a big IF
> with capital letters.
>
>
> I have a feeling that Linus did this on purpose.  For the

Heh, I had a trailing CR after the "with capital letters." and
one blank line between paragraphs, but I now see two blank lines
there.  So even in this modern day, preserving CRLF is not
something that happens by default -- you would need to make sure
that everybody on your mailpath to the recipient is set up the
right way.

> So I am slightly in favor of the change, but just barely.

So now I am less in favor of the change than when I wrote that
response.

-
: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]