On Thu, May 25, 2006 at 08:02:45PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Shawn Pearce <spearce@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > I think we had hoped that one of the two tools would prove to be > > _the_ annotation/blame tool and would get used but thus far that > > hasn't happened. > > I've been taking this as an indication that annotate/blame does > not actually matter in the real world. It probably doesn't matter in the real world. At the moment, I'd blame annotate for being wrong, I know it does the wrong thing on some merges, and I had a plan to try to fix it, but I got distracted by finding a new job and moving across the country, so I haven't really had a chance to fix it, something to look at shortly, I hope. (I'm having problems getting one of my machines back up, so that's going to slow me down slightly) > Or git is not yet used in the real world. Or perhaps a bit of > both. It's just that "annotate" isn't a common operation in the communities that Git has made it into. - : send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html