On Wed, 24 May 2006, Junio C Hamano wrote: > > A "have" object is not just has_sha1_file(), but it needs to be > reachable from one of our tips we have already verified as > complete You're right. And the strange part is that the commit we should give for the tag thing _should_ actually be pretty recent, and I wonder why we end up walking the whole damn tree history and saying "want" to basically them all. IOW, I think there's something more fundamentally wrong with the tag following. We _should_ have figured out much more quickly that we have it all. I'm starting to suspect that it's actually a tag-specific problem: we do that reachability crud all by commit history, so the tags are a total special case, and if we don't send the proper HAVE/WANT for those or mark them properly with THEY_HAVE/COMMON etc, maybe the algorithm just gets confused. I need to go pick up my youngest, so I'll be off-line on this for a while. Will try to think it through. Linus - : send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html