And Linus Torvalds writes: - - What kind of CRAP has Solaris become? Become? heh. Check mount's output; it's "mountpoint on device". Always has been. I think there might be a reason why certain other OSes have eaten their lunch, and it ain't the price. - It wasn't about what was "allowed by the standards", - that was the HP-SUX and AIX's excuses. No, AIX's excuse is that it's "dictated by these three standards over here and disallowed by those two, so clearly we have to support both behaviors depending on some footnote in our 1e9 page manual." wheee... - Have Sun people forgotten the difference between "quality" and "crap that - passes standards tests"? As far as I've been told, Sun's more interested in near-perfect backwards compatibility than external standards tests. It worked for Intel, right? ;) - Btw, even SuS says: [...] - New implementations are discouraged from returning X_OK unless at - least one execution permission bit is set." Now there is one possible, cross-OS problem that I haven't tested. You can chmod a-x and then use setfacl to grant one person execute access. I'm not sure if access works in that case, but that might possibly just say that current ACL systems are crap. Hmm. Does access handle SELinux or the other systems? That might be interesting for a public git server, but I don't know enough about it. - Somebody hit some Solaris engineers with a 2x4 clue-stick, please. I think you're targetting the wrong department... Their hands are tied. Jason, wondering if you could resist the SUS bait... - : send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html