Re: [PATCH] [BUG] Add a test to check git-prune does not throw away revs hidden by a graft.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On Fri, 19 May 2006, Yann Dirson wrote:
> 
> > We _could_ decide that fsck should just follow the "real parents" and the 
> > grafts _both_. That's the safe thing to do by default. Possibly with a 
> > flag to say "prefer one over the other", or even a "prefer which-ever 
> > exists".
> 
> I'm not sure I see how "prefer which-ever exists" would be useful - do
> you have anything precise in mind ?

It would be a "once you've pruned one or the other, don't complain any 
more about the fact that it doesn't exist" flag.

		Linus
-
: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]