Re: [PATCH] [BUG] Add a test to check git-prune does not throw away revs hidden by a graft.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Yann Dirson wrote:

> On Thu, May 18, 2006 at 03:53:36PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>> Yann Dirson <ydirson@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>> 
>> > To make my point maybe more clear: if someone really wants to make a
>> > graft permanent, wouldn't some history rewriting ... be the
>> > way to go,...
>> 
>> Yes.
> 
> So if temporary usage is a typical use for grafts, don't we want to
> protect people using them from pruning ?  I got no feedback to my
> suggestion of changing the default behaviour, even to say it was a bad
> idea :)

Perhaps prune should be conservative by default, and follow both grafts and
original parents, and use appropriate options to preserve or not preserve
grafts.

-- 
Jakub Narebski
Warsaw, Poland

-
: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]