On Thu, 18 May 2006 22:41:43 -0700 Junio C Hamano <junkio@xxxxxxx> wrote: > To me, if the user explicitly says --diff-filter or -S, it seems > more natural to interpret that the user wanted _some_ sort of > diff. Now, there are people who say raw format is anti-human, > which I consider is a valid view, but I think it is better than > NO_OUTPUT in that case. > > I wonder if doing something like this instead makes more sense > perhaps? Well, I was looking at the use of diff-filter and -S as a way to prune uninteresting commits from the log rather than as an desire to see the patch information. It's pretty natural to add -p or --stat along with the above options if that is what the user wants. If you make those implied by using --diff-filter or -S is there a way for the user to say, no patch and no stat? Sean - : send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html