Re: [RFC 2/5] Improve abstraction of ref lock/write.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Shawn Pearce <spearce@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Created 'struct ref_lock' to contain the data necessary to perform
> a ref update...
>
>  fetch.c |   32 +++++----
>  refs.c  |  236 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------------------
>  refs.h  |   24 ++++--
>  3 files changed, 144 insertions(+), 148 deletions(-)

Looks a bit intrusive probably necessary so not necessarily bad
but I'll postpone looking at this for now; maybe tomorrow or
more likely over the weekend.

Eyeballs from people touched the affected files in the past are
greatly appreciated.

-
: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]