Re: Unresolved issues #2

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, 6 May 2006 09:30:48 -0700 (PDT)
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Basically, it boils down to the end result.
> 
> If you design things for "people", then things tend to become hard to 
> automate, and it's hard to make wrappers around it. Maybe you've even made 
> the interfaces interactive, and thus any wrappers around it are simply 
> screwed, or need to do insane things.

Okay, I mistook the scope of you comments to apply to all of git rather than
as a reminder that we can't forget about the toolkit design.  So I take it
you're not at all against git including higher level user commands; just so
long as they're built on top of lower level toolkit commands that other
porcelain can use as well.

In this particular case I see "git repo-config" as the low level command that
any porcelain can use to access the remotes information and the proposed
"git remotes" as a simple convenience wrapper on top of this.  Of course,
everyone has to agree on the config file format; but that is true whether
the human-friendly wrapper exists or not.

Sean
-
: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]