Re: [PATCH] binary patch.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 5 May 2006, Junio C Hamano wrote:

> Nicolas Pitre <nico@xxxxxxx> writes:
> 
> >> +	delta = NULL;
> >> +	deflated = deflate_it(two->ptr, two->size, &deflate_size);
> >> +	if (one->size && two->size) {
> >> +		delta = diff_delta(one->ptr, one->size,
> >> +				   two->ptr, two->size,
> >> +				   &delta_size, deflate_size);
> >
> > Here you probably want to use deflate_size-1 (deflate_size can't be 0).
> 
> I am not sure if -1 is worth here.
> 
> The delta is going to be deflated and hopefully gets a bit
> smaller, so if we really care that level of detail, it might be
> worth to do (deflate_size*3/2) or something like that here, use
> delta with or without deflate whichever is smaller, and mark the
> uncompressed delta with a different tag ("uncompressed delta"?).
> And for symmetry, to deal with uncompressible data, we may want
> to have "uncompressed literal" as well.

Nah...  Please just forget that.  ;-)


Nicolas
-
: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]