[PATCH] improve diff-delta with sparse and/or repetitive data

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



It is useless to preserve multiple hash entries for consecutive blocks 
with the same hash.  Keeping only the first one will allow for matching 
the longest string of identical bytes while subsequent blocks will only 
allow for shorter matches.  The backward matching code will match the 
end of it as necessary.

This improves both performances (no repeated string compare with long 
successions of identical bytes, or even small group of bytes), as well 
as compression (less likely to need random hash bucket entry culling), 
especially with sparse files.

With well behaved data sets this patch doesn't change much.

Signed-off-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@xxxxxxx>

---

diff --git a/diff-delta.c b/diff-delta.c
index 35e517d..c618875 100644
--- a/diff-delta.c
+++ b/diff-delta.c
@@ -136,11 +136,12 @@ struct delta_index {
 
 struct delta_index * create_delta_index(const void *buf, unsigned long bufsize)
 {
-	unsigned int i, hsize, hmask, entries, *hash_count;
+	unsigned int i, hsize, hmask, entries, prev_val, *hash_count;
 	const unsigned char *data, *buffer = buf;
 	struct delta_index *index;
 	struct index_entry *entry, **hash;
 	void *mem;
+	unsigned long memsize;
 
 	if (!buf || !bufsize)
 		return NULL;
@@ -155,9 +156,10 @@ struct delta_index * create_delta_index(
 	hmask = hsize - 1;
 
 	/* allocate lookup index */
-	mem = malloc(sizeof(*index) +
-		     sizeof(*hash) * hsize +
-		     sizeof(*entry) * entries);
+	memsize = sizeof(*index) +
+		  sizeof(*hash) * hsize +
+		  sizeof(*entry) * entries;
+	mem = malloc(memsize);
 	if (!mem)
 		return NULL;
 	index = mem;
@@ -179,18 +181,26 @@ struct delta_index * create_delta_index(
 	}
 
 	/* then populate the index */
-	data = buffer + entries * RABIN_WINDOW - RABIN_WINDOW;
-	while (data >= buffer) {
+	prev_val = ~0;
+	for (data = buffer + entries * RABIN_WINDOW - RABIN_WINDOW;
+	     data >= buffer;
+	     data -= RABIN_WINDOW) {
 		unsigned int val = 0;
 		for (i = 1; i <= RABIN_WINDOW; i++)
 			val = ((val << 8) | data[i]) ^ T[val >> RABIN_SHIFT];
-		i = val & hmask;
-		entry->ptr = data + RABIN_WINDOW;
-		entry->val = val;
-		entry->next = hash[i];
-		hash[i] = entry++;
-		hash_count[i]++;
-		data -= RABIN_WINDOW;
+		if (val == prev_val) {
+			/* keep the lowest of consecutive identical blocks */
+			entry[-1].ptr = data + RABIN_WINDOW;
+		} else {
+			prev_val = val;
+			i = val & hmask;
+			entry->ptr = data + RABIN_WINDOW;
+			entry->val = val;
+			entry->next = hash[i];
+			hash[i] = entry++;
+			hash_count[i]++;
+			entries--;
+		}
 	}
 
 	/*
@@ -220,6 +230,10 @@ struct delta_index * create_delta_index(
 	}
 	free(hash_count);
 
+	/* If we didn't use all hash entries, free the unused memory. */
+	if (entries)
+		index = realloc(index, memsize - entries * sizeof(*entry));
+
 	return index;
 }
 
-
: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]