On Thu, 27 Apr 2006 14:27:05 +0100 David Woodhouse <dwmw2@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > First... When publishing trees, I currently give both the git:// URL for > people who want to pull the tree, and the http:// URL to gitweb for > those who just want to browse. > > It would be useful if I could get away with giving just one URL -- > probably the http:// one to gitweb. If gitweb were to have a mode in > which it gave a referral to the git:// URL, and if the git tools would > use that, then that would work well. This sounds like a good idea. > Secondly, it would be useful if gitweb would list the branches in a > repository and allow each of them to be viewed in the same way as it > does the master branch. At the bottom of the Summary page it already lists the branches, underneath the tags. Sean - : send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html