On Fri, 28 Apr 2006, Paul Mackerras wrote: > Linus Torvalds writes: > > Any possibility of something light that? I'd _love_ to be able to see the > > whole tree, but with things that touch certain files or things that are > > newer highlighted. > > That should be quite doable. How about I show the commits that are in > the highlight view in bold? That won't conflict with the existing > yellow background for commits that match the find criteria. Bold sounds good to me. > > (Btw, the "revision information" is also cool things like "--unpacked". I > > actually use "gitk --unpacked" every once in a while, just because it's > > such a cool way to say "show me everything I've added since I packed the > > repo last). > > OK, I didn't know about --unpacked. :) I plan to add stuff to the > view definition window to allow you to select commits to > include/exclude by reachability from given commits (by head/tag/ID) > and when I do I can add a way to say --unpacked too. It's more of a gimmick, but I find myself using it occasionally just to decide whether it's time to repack. It falls out automatically - not because I thought I'd ever want it, but because the --unpacked semantics for git-rev-list are what incremental packing needed. (Of course, sane people probably just do "git count-objects" to decide to repack). Linus - : send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html