Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > On Tue, 25 Apr 2006, Jakub Narebski wrote: >> >> Additionally, in "related" links we require that object exist (core git), >> regardless of detailed semantics. And history browsers (gitk, qgit) can use it, drawing line, regardless of semantics. > And as I've now mentioned a hundred times, that's just unacceptable to me. > No suggested use of this has actually been useful, that I can tell. I don't mean we shouldn't define semantic for each use of "related" or "note" header. Just like email X-* headres have detailed form and semantic (long, long time ago Sender was X-Sender for example ;-). It's just a toolkit. As to suggested "related" (requiring object to exists) headers: "bind", "prior", and perhaps "revert". -- Jakub Narebski Warsaw, Poland - : send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html