On Thu, 20 Apr 2006, Shawn Pearce wrote: > Nicolas Pitre <nico@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > With the patch above the Linux kernel pack is 0.3% smaller with 1% more > > CPU usage. But like for the diff-delta hash list limiting code this > > small overhead is certainly a good compromize to avoid big degradations > > in some other cases. > > Hmm. See the email I just sent. I was seeing a good 10% increase > in my own tests on a Linux kernel repository. But I guess I can > hope that my test was flawed somehow and it really is closer to a 1% > increase in running time, making it more likely that the above fix > makes it into GIT. Well, I repeated the kernel run and this time it took 2.5% more CPU with the patch. But the thing is that I get a +/- 1% difference between successive runs. So while the patch does add a certain overhead, it appears to be in the same range as noise here. Nicolas - : send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html