Re: [RFH] Exploration of an alternative diff_delta() algorithm

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, 9 Apr 2006, Peter Eriksen wrote:

> On Sun, Apr 09, 2006 at 01:40:14PM -0400, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> ...
> > It also has lots of compilation warnings.
> 
> Hm, I don't get any warnings.  Would you mind pasting them, so I
> can see what it's about?

gcc -o diff-delta.o -c -g -O2 -Wall -DSHA1_HEADER='<openssl/sha.h>'  diff-delta.c
diff-delta.c: In function 'diff_delta':
diff-delta.c:123: warning: pointer targets in passing argument 1 of 'init_hash' differ in signedness
diff-delta.c:124: warning: pointer targets in passing argument 1 of 'init_hash' differ in signedness
diff-delta.c:170: warning: pointer targets in passing argument 1 of 'hash' differ in signedness
diff-delta.c:171: warning: pointer targets in passing argument 1 of 'hash' differ in signedness
diff-delta.c:203: warning: pointer targets in passing argument 1 of 'init_hash' differ in signedness
diff-delta.c:204: warning: pointer targets in passing argument 1 of 'init_hash' differ in signedness

Also you should avoid declaring new variables after code in the same 
scope, like you do with version_offset for example.  This is a feature 
that many C compilers don't support.


Nicolas
-
: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]