Nicolas Pitre <nico@xxxxxxx> writes: > On Fri, 7 Apr 2006, Junio C Hamano wrote: > >> Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxx> writes: >> >> > On Mon, 3 Apr 2006, Linus Torvalds wrote: >> >> >> >> That said, I think git _does_ have problems with large pack-files. We have >> >> some 32-bit issues etc >> > >> > I should clarify that. git _itself_ shouldn't have any 32-bit issues, but >> > the packfile data structure does. The index has 32-bit offsets into >> > individual pack-files. >> > >> > That's not hugely fundamental,... >> >> Linus _does_ understand what he means, but let me clarify and >> outline a possible future direction. > > For the record, the delta code also has 32-bit limitations of its own > presently. It cannot encode a delta against a buffer which is larger > than 4GB. > > I however made sure the byte 0 could be used as a prefix for future > encoding extensions, like 64-bit file offsets for example. True the delta data representation, not just the "delta code", has that limitation, but I do not think you issue "insert 0-byte literal data" command from the deltifier side right now, so we should be OK. Maybe we would want to check (cmd == 0) case to detect delta extension that we do not handle right now? - : send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html