Martin Waitz <tali@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: >> +-x:: >> + Don't use the ignore rules. This allows removing all untracked >> + files, including build products. This can be used (possibly in >> + conjunction with gitlink:git-reset[1]) to create a pristine >> + working directory to test a clean build. > > as ignored files are generally generated files, doesn't it make sense > to clean up the "ignored" files, and leave other untracked files > alone? That way you don't loose files which you forgot to add to git. Sounds like a sane suggestion, but my previous comment about "make clean" broken for people who want this "git clean" feature applies here as well. One justification I can think of for "git clean" without -x flag is to make a clean tree that has only the source and build products, removing editor backup files, throwaway test output files and friends, but as you pointed out, this risks losing newly created source files that you forgot to add, so I would need a bit of convincing before I use such a command myself. Compared to that, removing only ignored files sounds like a much safer operation -- they are explicitly listed as expendable, so it is a lot less likely to lose anything important. But again, that is what "make clean" is there for... - : send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html