Re: Gitk strangeness..

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Paul Mackerras, Wed, Mar 29, 2006 00:51:34 +0200:
> Junio C Hamano writes:
> 
> > How about this alternative patch, then?  It turned out to be
> > quite convoluted as I feared.
> 
> That's brilliant.  Thank you!  With the patch to gitk below, the
> graph display on Linus' example looks much saner.
> 

Well... Could you take a look at these screenshots, please?
http://home.arcor.de/fork0/bug/gitk1.jpg (this one is BIG, 400k, 2456x949)
http://home.arcor.de/fork0/bug/gitk2.jpg
http://home.arcor.de/fork0/bug/gitk3.jpg

The compressed repository is being uploaded there:

http://home.arcor.de/fork0/bug/ggg.tar.bz2 (~6Mb)

The old gitk produced a denser graph, which wasn't perfect too, but
had a higher count of visible commit titles (and this is two-monitor
setup, too).

-
: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]