On Sun, 26 Mar 2006, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Petr Baudis <pasky@xxxxxxx> writes: > > >> No, it's the expected output just because you expected merges to always > >> show up. Merges get ignored if any of the parents have the same content > >> already. > > > > Eek. Can I avoid that? What was the reason for choosing this behavior? > > Perhaps rev-list --sparse? No. "--sparse" still removes the uninteresting parents of merges. It just doesn't then make the linear history any denser. Linus - : send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html